I wanted to give everyone some idea of where Trial Logs is headed from here.
One goal is to bring attention to the some of the injustices citizens are forced to endure through our legal system. You'll notice we added "Larken" at the beginning of each audio segment. That is step one in preparation of covering more of the upcoming trials. Future audio segments may lead with "Tessa","Arthur", "Erwin" and whoever the government targets next. So rest assured, Trial Logs is just getting started.
We also hope to bring you a responsible analysis of the trial of Larken Rose, a man who wanted to bring his findings of years of legal research to the attention of our nation.
The goal of a fair and just trial should be to expose the truth. It would allow Larken to present his findings and permit a jury to evaluate the man and his work. But that is not what we witnessed.
How does a fair trial deny Larken the right to show the jury his "Taxable Income Report" or his "Theft by Deception" video or to simply afford him the opportunity to walk the jury through his interpretation of the law after years of exhaustive research? The absurd restrictions imposed equate to sending a boxer into the ring with their hands tied behind their back, and certainly prevented the jury from getting a true glimpse of the man whose future they would ultimately decide.
The purpose of our courts should be to get at the truth. Yet, anyone that followed this trial is left with the impression that the governments goal throughout this trial was to evade the truth. The governments case as presented by Floyd Miller lacked substance. His closing focused on portraying Larken as an "Anarchist" who didn't even like our own "Constitution" because it gave to much power to the federal government. Then he went on to suggest that the jury should focus on all of the circumstantial evidence.
So, when broken down the governments case looks like this:
1. Deny the defendant the right to present an effective defense.
2. Portray him to the jury as a villain
3. Point to circumstantial evidence much of which was misrepresented.
I hope the government is satisfied with their conduct, because we will be analyzing and dissecting the transcripts and courtroom audio recordings of the trial with the hope of posting relevant portions here on Trial Logs for everyone's consideration. We need to bring national attention to what our court system and government has become.
All we ask is that these defendants be given a fair trial. I don't believe we have seen that in Larken's case and we believe the analysis of the trial records we hope to post here will make that apparent for anyone that takes the time to look it over.
This is far from over.