Monday, October 10, 2005

There is so much corruption going on right in front of everyone in the courtroom, but there is also hanky panky going on behind the scenes. Check this out. The IRS prosecutors were seen coming out of the judges chambers even though the judges secretary tried to secretively wave them around the back way. She was too late though. They were already busted walking out of the judges chambers by the defense attorneys and spectators. When the defense asked the judge about this, the judge said "yes there was ex parte communication, but there was no impropriety and that's all I'm saying about it." Can you believe this?!

The question is Why weren't they, Irwin Schiff and the defense, notified and included?

Irwin wants as many people as possible in court on Tuesday. He's going to be dropping some verbal bombs and needs lots of witnesses to be there for the fireworks. I know it's short notice but, if ever there was a time to go, Now is it! Irwin needs us to be there. PLEASE TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW.

Judge Dawson is denying certain witness to testify and attempting to limit Irwin's witnesses and wanting to know what they are going to be testifying to, before any witnesses go on the stand. Irwin is planning on calling Bob Schulz, Joe Banister, John Turner and more.

Shelley Waxman, former US attorney in Chicago, has known Irwin for15 yrs. In Shelley's book, "In the Teeth of the Wind" he speaks about the corruption in the judiciary/legal profession. Irwin might speak more about that tonight on the broadcast. To listen, the audio links come alive a minute or two before the broadcast at 7PM pacific 10PM eastern. Be sure to tune in. The link to the station is down toward the bottom of click on "LISTEN LIVE" or the direct link to the station is

I hope we have a huge turn-out on Tuesday! Let's overflow the place!

And don't forget to check the audio blogs at and (new photos) and nightly updates.

I've got to go and pack.

Have a great Monday off!

Irwin Schiff News
Join a tax workshop in your city here

Subscribe/Un-subscribe to IS News e-mail here

Disclaimer: Irwin Schiff News posts the above information and web sites for educational purposes only and referral to them is not to be construed as an endorsement or legal advice. All Irwin Schiff News (IS News) text messages are presumed to be first amendment protected freedom of speech on issues of importance to the Civilian population of the United States of America. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

17 Old Comments:

The trial is not about law -
It is about assumption and presumption. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 11:47 AM  

If the IRS and the Judge had the law and the regulations on their side, this would be a slam dunk case for them and there would be no need for them to have ex-parte communication. HINT!

The JUDGE admitted he had ex-part communication WITH THE IRS Prosecutors, but sheeply said, but there was no impropriety. YEAH RIGHT! and G. Bush isn't an alcoholic and ex-crack addict, oh forgive me, ex-cocaine snorting rich-boy.

The Bible said SHUN THE VERY APPEARANCE OF EVIL. Which this Judge failed to do because he doesn't want IRWIN TO WIN.


EVERYONE SHOULD WEAR THE LETTER K-C on there clothes when they attend the million man/woman march on this Tuesday at 9:00AM.


Can I join the Tax Honesty Movement?, please. SIGNED QUARTALOO!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 12:38 PM  

A Letter to:

Dale Eastman,

Some time ago you asked for critique with regard to you web site. It is obvious that you possess a greater talent for comprehending law than I. We all have talents and should help each other. I believe I have an understanding that may help you and have no problem with everyone reading it.

Your position rests in whole or in part upon you being an American, as I understand it. This is certainly what we believe we are. However the government documents DO NOT show that. Under the “Best Evidence” Rule they have, on file, documents that say otherwise and if those documents are not rebutted and/or corrected you are, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW and of the COURT, NOT an American at all! Political status is “Elected” not legislated and that is further notice of the voluntary nature of the tax!

We, I’m speaking only of those who love America and want to be Americans, have been ambushed and tricked into voluntarily (so they say) signing away our birth rights in order to gain a so called benefit from the Legislative Democracy. This happens many ways and is not limited to the following – signing up for Social Security. Using International Bills of Exchange called Federal Reserve Notes. Checking the box “US CITIZEN” on forms and documents. Et al

So when the Court says, “You misapplied the 861 rule” could it be that you didn’t have the correct STATUS, on record, to apply it?

Sincerely, Your friend and brother, CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 12:41 PM  

anon @ 1:38P-

You sound like a 6 year old that seems scared by what this site means to your future as a gov't IRS employee / tax lawyer / tax preparer / etc.

Perhaps you should spend your time deciding what you want to be when you grow up instead of picking on those who are trying to make a difference in the world.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 12:44 PM  

Federal Reserve Notes are PRIVATE debt instruments masquerading as Money, hereinafter referred to as Private Script. One cannot PAY for anything with a Federal Reserve Note; one can only discharge a debt. To use someone else’s, (not yours, your American governments or the publics) money has dire consequences attached to it. Ask yourself, if you use someone else’s note (debt based) to discharge your debts when you allegedly purchase something, might they (the private owner of the instrument you used) have a claim against YOU?

This trial is about way more than Irwin’s interpretation of the law. On a micro viewpoint that is what is taking place, but on a macro view, it is about the rest of our lives. Learn about it, and then and only then make a claim when you can prove your claim. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 12:50 PM  

"they attend the million man/woman march on this Tuesday at 9:00AM"

There is ANOTHER million man march planned?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 1:48 PM  

To Irwin: If the following is true and correct maybe it will help you … the Code of Federal Regulations, NOT the Internal Revenue Code, are considered to be official publications of the federal government because they are "judicially noticed" (courts must defer to them) and because they are considered by law to be official supplements to the Federal Register. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 1:51 PM  

To: Dale Eastman, and anyone concerned.
From: CJ

Who is sitting on the jury? To be a juror one must declare them self as a U.S. CITIZEN. What is a U.S. CITIZEN? It is a term not found in the Constitution, therefore must be term outside the Constitution. It is a term not found in any legal dictionary. It is a term not found even in the fourteenth amendment. It is found in the UN Covenant on Political Rights. Did you know that you have to be a US CITIZEN to sit on the jury? Fact is the first time anyone ever ran across this term was on his or her SS 5 form, which was told to them they MUST have to live, well to work, but ya gotta work to live.

Form I-197 from the Bureau of Immigration is an application to obtain a identification card as a US CITIZEN, but an American born in the fifty states can’t get one. It is issued to people born in the insular possessions.

Title 28 (enacted as positive law) defines the United States as a Federal Corporation. What’s up with that? How can a corporation have citizens?

US CITIZEN is a class of person not incorporated into the States of the Union. Go ask a person from Guam or Puerto Rico, or the Northern Mariana Islands if they are US CITIZENS. Yes they are and can get a card to prove it.

Citizenship is a political choice. Might we have accidentally or by fraud had our status altered and is not attached to our birth right and thus on all the Article 1, Clause 8 Section 17 government documents show that we are indeed US CITIZENS wherein they have EXCLUSIVE LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION over us and thus haven’t the status we were taught?

Irwin will say that the above is not important and not simple enough. I agree, it isn't simple but might it be a most important aspect?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 2:13 PM  

So when the Court says, “You misapplied the 861 rule” could it be that you didn’t have the correct STATUS, on record, to apply it?

Sincerely, Your friend and brother, CJ

Well, Mr./Ms. CJ, that could very well be the case.

I have Pete Hendrickson's CRACKING THE CODE.

Plug for Mr. Hendrickson's web site

It is but one more avenue to explore, examine, and study.

Regardless of what avenue one choosed to explore, be it Hendrickson's, Rose's, or Schiff's it ends with the conclusion that the government is unlawful and turning evil.

By Anonymous Dale Eastman, at 10/10/2005 2:54 PM  

Whatever happened to the postal employee that Hendrickson blew up in that deal where he got the year in prison?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 2:56 PM  

To: Dale Eastman, and anyone concerned.
From: CJ

Who is sitting on the jury?


Here's what Dave Champion says on the issue:

Jury Summons Response Letter Overview

This jury summons response letter has been used successfully by Americans who are unwilling to sign any government document without knowing what sneaky politicians and government lawyers are trying to rope them into. In the case of the Los Angeles County Jury Summons, their goal is to get you to confirm that you are a 14th Amendment citizen. If you are unaware as to why that may well be an inaccurate admission [made under penalty of perjury] for you, read www.originalintent citizenship.php

To date, this jury letter has had a 100% success rate at stopping the jury summons process concerning the Citizens who have used it in LA County. This is because the government does not want you to know what the "legal terms" they are using really mean.

People using this letter in counties other than Los Angeles, and in a state other than California, will have to alter the specifics accordingly, however we caution you against changing the meat of the text.

This letter is posted to insure that all Americans have a clear understanding of the meaning of the legal terms used within documents their government attempts to require them to sign, especially under penalty of perjury, and is not intended to discourage jury duty. However, if you choose to partake in jury duty, we encourage you to exercise your inalienable right to act as a Fully Informed Juror and determine both the LAW and the FACTS for yourself.


View the Jury Summons Response Letter

By Anonymous Dale Eastman, at 10/10/2005 3:04 PM  

Wanna tick 'em all off??? Let's start a bank using Liberty Dollars. Perfectly legal tender...backed by gold and silver...what a boat load of fun that would be.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 3:22 PM  

So if the record shows and the government presumes you to be a US Citizen do they not have jurisdiction and thus under 861 you are required to pay?

Champions letter with regard to juries is indeed on point. I have first hand personal knowledge that you will not be seated if you raise those issues.

Now, I do not take sides with the way and how the government runs the show, however consider that IF the record shows that you have made claim to being an "individual" (a term not defined in the code) and a US CITIZEN and then might it appear, by your election on forms, that you are liable? CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 3:22 PM  

So if the record shows and the government presumes you to be a US Citizen do they not have jurisdiction and thus under 861 you are required to pay?

Okay, before replying, I have to say that I am only somewhat aware of the points you are going to use me to make. This could very well be an education for myself as well as all the lurkers.

I will take the role of adversary so that you may develope your points.

Of issue is the belief by everyone that they are U.S. Citizens. I have looked into this point a bit, but (for you R.A. Heinlein fans) I don't fully GROK these points.

As adversary, I'll start.

1. I must be a U.S. Citizen, I live in the U.S.

JG is using to retain anonymity.

Do you want a page put together to record this?

By Anonymous dale eastman, at 10/10/2005 3:36 PM  

To Dale Eastman, and others,

Did you apply and sign the SS 5 for the act and did the act set up your account with the IRS?

When doing so, if you did, was that the first time you ever saw the term US Citizen?

[Of course the SS system is a Ponzi scheme illegal for CITIZENS but ok for government.]

Have you read the entire act?

Might it have created a trust relationship which is why the government refers to the "trust fund" but claims no trustee? Might you be the trustee for the trust fund in your name and executed by you making claim as a US Citizen which is why they always bring SS # into EVERY TAX CASE? CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 3:58 PM  

Everybody should cut and paste the comments on the first page of this blog and email it to the Lasvegas papers.

I googled for LV papers and found The Las Vegas sun Executives

Barbara Greenspun

Brian Greenspun
President and Editor

Daniel Greenspun
Vice President

Michael J. Kelley
Managing Editor

Here is all I could find for the Las Vegas Tribune

Las Vegas review Journal
Sherman R. Frederick

Thomas Mitchell

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 5:39 PM  

Hey guys:

Since we know perfectly well that a million people will NOT be showing up, howzabout we DON'T call it a "Million Man March"?


Dave and CJ: good discussion.

By Blogger Jamie, at 10/14/2005 9:46 AM