Friday, October 07, 2005

The government has rested it's case and turned its attention to the intimidation of Irwins's witnesses who are now being read Miranda warnings before they take the stand to testify. Contrast that with the governments ability to grant immunity to their witnesses and the inequity of the system becomes quite clear.

Any defendant in this star chamber arena is severely disadvantaged. They are out spent, out manned and confronted with judicial bias.

This trial provides us a look at our government and justice system at its worst.

I would encourage everyone to listen to the October 6th conference call with Freedom Law School.

21 Old Comments:

COMPLAIN TO THE JUDGE!

Are you too disgusted with the way Irwin is being treated by the judge and prosecutors at his trial? Then let the judge know what you think of these proceedings. You can write him directly using the address below. Let’s inundate him with mail, and let him know how we feel. If you received thousands of letters telling you that they way you are doing your job is unacceptable, wouldn’t it have an impact on you?
WRITE A SHORT LETTER TODAY! DO IT RIGHT NOW!

Hon. Kent J. Dawson,
United States District Court Judge,
U.S. District Court of Nevada,
333 South Las Vegas Boulevard,
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 11:08 AM  

Some good discussion on exactly why the income tax cannot apply to labor done by one of the people of the republic of the united states of america.

See here

Quite long, but well worth the read for those willing to question the actions of the court in this case, the IRS in general, and the application of the income tax.

By Blogger Nekogami, at 10/07/2005 11:21 AM  

I’ve a great money making idea for anyone who wants to do it $$$
Design a handcuff type devise for the human brain and mouth, get a contract from the government to produce them and sell them, collecting tax dollars (of course) from the government, for use in on witnesses in the U.S. District Courts.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 11:32 AM  

Can you please forward this message to Irwin's staff?

I THINK WE HAVE CAUGHT THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RED-HANDED IN THE ACT OF DELIBERATE FRAUD
(see full details below: I faxed the critical pages
to Irwin's fax number earlier today: (702) 385-6917 )

If Schiff is BARRED from admitting into evidence
both the law and his understanding of the law, then
DAWSON'S COURT IS SURELY A STAR CHAMBER
and Irwin has been victimized by a MIS-TRIAL!!

THAT IS NOW PAINFULLY OBVIOUS, IMHO,
AS IT WAS ALSO PAINFULLY OBVIOUS
WHEN THIS INTERVIEW WAS TAPE-RECORDED:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/trumane/interview.htm
(begin reading at "Cheek")

AND, IT IS TRUE FOR NUMEROUS JURISDICTIONAL REASONS,
MOST OF WHICH IRWIN HAS ALREADY RAISED!!


I am standing by. BEST REGARDS TO Irwin Schiff AND
HIS ENTIRE COMMUNITY OF FAMILY & LOYAL FRIENDS.


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 11:34 AM  

Judge Dawson,

You get an A+ for turning the U.S. court system into a
Spanish inquisition.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 1:30 PM  

My concern is having the jury rigged against Irwin

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 1:44 PM  

Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
George Washington

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 2:39 PM  

The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted.
James Madison

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 2:44 PM  

There seems to be two (2) types of people who are posting here. Those who are truly interested in getting to the TRUTH of this matter and those who insist on name calling and will do anything to distract these people and make anybody who questions the legality of the income tax look stupid.

I would think some of the posts are put here by the I.R.S. in order to accomplish this. The people who are looking for the truth are NOT TAX PROTESTERS, they only protest illegal taxation. So lets quit with the name calling.

For example, Dale Eastman's and others post usually quote facts and the others only contain name calling.

Does it not seem curious that If I wanted to know that if I owed an income tax and I called the IRS and asked what law made me liable, they will NOT put in writting what law that is ?

If I go down to the IRS with the Internal Revenue Code and ask the same question and ask them to show me the law, they will ask me to leave the office.

Is it not funny that when you look in the "Index to Internal Revenue Code" and look under Alcohol taxes, I can find "liability for", "payment for", and "penalties"

Is it not funny that when you look under Tobacco taxes, I can find "failure to file or pay tax", "liability for", and "penalties". The same goes for Gasoline.

When I go "Payment of tax" page 229 of the IRC, I see Alcohol, Gasoline, Tobacco.

Nowhere in any of these sections do I see INCOME TAX.

Is it not strange that the Supreme Court said in Spreckles Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192US397 (at page 416) that a "citizen is exempt from taxation, unless the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language."

In any case, during the period between 1912 and 1921, the Supreme Court sought out hammer out the meaning of "income" and in Merchant's Loan and Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 US 509 (1921) laid out its most comprehensive definition (at pages 518, 519) when it held: There would seem to be no room to doubt that the word (income) must be given the same meaning in all of the Income Act of Congress that was given to it in the CORPORATION EXCISE TAX ACT and that what that meaning is HAS NOW BECOME DEFINITELY SETTLED BY DECISIONS OF THIS COURT.

Last question, the 1939 Code Section 22. Gross income-(a) General definition. "Gross income" includes gains, profits, and income from SALARIES, WAGES, OR COMPENSATION FOR PERSONAL SERVICES etc.

The 1954 Code Section 61. Gross income defined.
(a) General definitions.
Except as otherwise provided in this-subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items;
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commisions,fringe benefits, and similar items.

Why did Congress find it necessaary to remove the words SALARIES, WAGES and compensation for PERSONAL services ?

In H.R. 8300, Section 61 (a) provides that gross income includes "all income FROM whatever source derived." This definition is based upon the sixteenth amendment and the word "income" is used as in section 22 (a) in its constitutional sense.

M.D.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 2:52 PM  

You said:


COMPLAIN TO THE JUDGE!

Are you too disgusted with the way Irwin is being treated by the judge and prosecutors at his trial? Then let the judge know what you think of these proceedings. You can write him directly using the address below. Let’s inundate him with mail, and let him know how we feel. If you received thousands of letters telling you that they way you are doing your job is unacceptable, wouldn’t it have an impact on you?
WRITE A SHORT LETTER TODAY! DO IT RIGHT NOW!

Hon. Kent J. Dawson,
United States District Court Judge,
U.S. District Court of Nevada,
333 South Las Vegas Boulevard,
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Would you happen to have his homeaddress and phone number?
Thank You
A concerned citizen
JASPER, TEXAS

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 3:56 PM  

"Would you happen to have his homeaddress and phone number?
Thank You
A concerned citizen
JASPER, TEXAS"

You aren't *really* that stupid, are you?

By Anonymous Jack Spitz, at 10/07/2005 4:18 PM  

Iwrin has the law on his side but the government has Judge Dawson.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 4:54 PM  

"Iwrin has the law on his side but the government has Judge Dawson."

The government doesn't need the Judge as long as Irwin keeps up his antics. Cindy's and Larry's attorneys must be furious at the game he's playing. He's coming across as so unbelievably stubborn and senile that no jury on earth will think that Larry and Cindy could be gullible enough to believe that what he says has merit.

Why do you think they keep asking over and over again for the cases to be severed?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 6:08 PM  

In my opinion the case of the U.S v.Irwin,Cindy, and Larry will raise more questions, and leave them unaswered then are set before the court in the indictment, witch is contrary to the established purpose of the court.

By Blogger To do nothing is perilous!, at 10/07/2005 6:24 PM  

"The proposed Constitution is, in strictness, neither a national nor a federal constitution; but a composition of both."
James Madison

What you have happening in court has nothing to do with Irwin per say. What you are witnessing is the legislative democracy at work wherein the Constitution formed two countries, at the same time, via Article 1 Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. (see above quote)

One country/nation is bound by the Rill of Rights...the other has exclusive legislative jurisdiction and uses fiat debt currency so when you go to the store and buy something you simply "discharge" debt not "Pay" for anything. The Federal govt. give you a benefit of "Limited Liability" to do this so you can't be prosecuted for doing it. This is a NEXIS that binds you to the Art 1, Sec. 8 Clause 17 nation you see at work with this trial.

The Republic used real money (of substance) and though the Republic still exists most everyone has declared themselves either by contract or by commerce as a citizen of the Legislative Democracy under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, and thus are bound to it, while believing they are Americans and live in the Republic.

As FDR said, "We are substituting the appearance of reality for reality" hmmm...makes that Matrix movie more interesting -

Now before some of you call me names...please read and learn first so there can be productive conversation as I can learn the truth, through facts, evidence and law from anyone willing to show it. I fail to learn from reactionary or anti-social behaviors. Sincerely, CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 6:36 PM  

Would you happen to have his homeaddress and phone number?
Thank You
A concerned citizen
JASPER, TEXAS


Contact Choice Point, I bet they'll have that and a lot more.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 6:39 PM  

The government doesn't need the Judge as long as Irwin keeps up his antics.

What antics would that be?

Holding a printed copy of the Internal Revenue Code and saying, "That's not the law, THIS [thumps IRC book] IS THE LAW!"?

Or would that be the antic where he says "Show me the law that makes me liable, Show me the delegation order that gives the IRS any authority, and I'll plead guilty"?

By Anonymous Dale Eastman, at 10/07/2005 7:36 PM  

Would you happen to have his homeaddress and phone number?
Thank You
A concerned citizen
JASPER, TEXAS

I think that was supposed to be a joke....Jasper Texes is where they dragged a black guy behind a pick-up till nothing was left but his bones

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/07/2005 8:47 PM  

"I think that was supposed to be a joke....Jasper Texes is where they dragged a black guy behind a pick-up till nothing was left but his bones"

I don't find that at all funny.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 12:07 PM  

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism

I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-Thomas Jefferson

By Blogger To do nothing is perilous!, at 10/08/2005 12:33 PM  

Anonymous cowardly unamused person read:

"I think that was supposed to be a joke....Jasper Texes is where they dragged a black guy behind a pick-up till nothing was left but his bones"

...and said:

"I don't find that at all funny."

Neither do I. Therapeutic, maybe, but not funny.


Dave, I agree 100% with your comments on the blog page (the ones which spurred this page of replies).

By Blogger Jamie, at 10/13/2005 11:59 AM