Friday, October 07, 2005

Dear Subscriber,

This is just a quick note to let you all know that Tessa's trial has been delayed. It is now scheduled to begin November 7th.

Sincerely,

Larken Rose
larken@taxableincome.net
http://www.861.info
http://www.theft-by-deception.com

9 Old Comments:

How many days has Bob Schulz attended Irwin's trial?

How many days has Sherry Jackson attended Irwin's trial?

How many days has Michael Badnarik attended Irwin's trial?

Looks like all of these people can spot a loser a mile off.

Despite a few dozen internet responses, there was still only about a half-dozen people who actually attended the trial last week.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 8:55 AM  

What is this a popularity contest? People still have to work for a living and may not live close enough to get to the trial. Just because we are not at the trial doesn't mean we aren't listening and taking part in some other way.

The only losers we spot are the ones that belong to the government. Their lawless, corrupt ways need to be widely publicized to all Americans, even the anonymous ones with the blinders on.

Those of you that refuse to open your eyes and respond to the corruption and fraud committed by the government, by breaking their very own laws, are not Americans in my eyes. Regardless of what you think of Mr. Schiff, who I am a supporter of.

Freedom is the peoples right!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 10:05 AM  

Oh, I am SURE the IRS Gestapo will be harassing ALL the defense witnesses for the rest of their lives;
that is their M.O., to instill FEAR just as the Judge did, probably under the suggestion, if not the instruction,of the Prosecuting Attorneys. After all, the Judge does EXACTLY as the Prosecution says. What the Judge tells the witnesses is, WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT (IRS and JUDICIAL, we work as a
TEAM) AND WE WILL NAIL YOU FOR SURE ONE DAY, SO WATCH OUT. (In other words, WHAT IN THE HELL
ARE DOING HERE, STUPID?)

Anyone believes the Judge is trying to do the witnesses a FAVOR, you are naive. The Judge does not give a RAT s patootee about the witnesses and we all know it. No Judge gives TAX DEFENDANTS and their supporters any favors. NONE. The Judges in these TAX CASES does not allow the LAW
to be reviewed or mentioned. The Judge says HE will tell the Jury the Law. Yes, he will, most certainly. The law as he wants to present it, not as written for any Jury to review; the law so as to assure and procure a CONVICTION.

The Judge accomplished his intent to instill fear (OFF THE RECORD, I might add, so no one can ever prove it on Appeal or other wise) .

The IRWIN SCHIFF TRIAL, THE LARKEN ROSE TRIAL ARE A SHAM!

We used to think we lived in a nation where the Government was FOR and BY the people.

What a JOKE. We live in a nation where
there are a few who believe THEY know more than anyone else and therefore THEY will rule and make all decisions; and LIE if THEY must, to achieve THEIR goals; just as in WMD as a reason for
invading Iraq, 9/11 Twin Towers coming down due to Air planes hitting them, the Pentagon LIE, etc., etc., ad infinitum.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 11:43 AM  

Wonderfully stated anon. above - Here are some more from MEN who are of like mind...

"Democracy is the vilest form of government... democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention: have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property: and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. "
James Madison

WERE DID OUR REPUBLIC GO? OUR ORIGINAL REPUBLIC WOULD NOT ALLOW FOR THE ATTROCITIES WITNESSED AT THIS AND OTHER TRIALS. cj

"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood."
James Madison

THOSE OF YOU WHO FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THE BIG THINGS ARE IN FOR A RUDE AWAKENING WHEN THE LITTLE THINGS BEGIN TO MATTER AND TAKE AFFECT UPON ...YOU...
cj

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 11:46 AM  

And cheer the government on, much as a an attendee at a football game pulling for the team; and that your team CHEATS, LIES, CONTROLS THE RULES and OWNS THE REFEREES, you care not at all. Then, upon your team WINNING, you say, SEE, I TOLD YOU SO and mock us in your glea.

You are scumbags. Leave us alone.

The IRWIN SCHIFF TRIAL IS A SHAM!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 1:48 PM  

"You are scumbags."

No comments from CJ about name calling?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 4:31 PM  

It was a democracy that crucified Christ! Some freedom!!!!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 7:53 PM  

Anonymous said...
"You are scumbags."

No comments from CJ about name calling?

Sorry was out of town and didn't get my comment in soon enough? Well here it is.

No matter what side, name calling produces nothing...HOWEVER let's examine the motives. There are people, who are supposed to be our fellow man and woman and fellow Americans that call people names, on the site, even though they don't know the people personally and the people have not done one thing to harm the name caller... NOW compare that with a person who may have been harmed or feels as though he or she IS being harmed, by the government (a fiction) and calls that body politic, that fiction, scumbags.

I don't defend the idea of name calling for it produces nothing as said, however it may relieve someone's stress, anger or pain that has been, in some form, inflicted upon them.

bottom line: I can understand to call a fiction a name when that fiction has sought to bring harm and WE ALL have been harmed in some form or other by the STATE, the Government. I cannot understand why someone would take personal stabs at another just because they believe differently and have not brought personal harm to the name caller.

Were not black people linched because they "looked" different. Why maintain that type of view against individuals because they may think, read or comprehend different?

I found my father with his head mostly seperated from his body due to the outrageous pressure the IRS placed upon him. 84 yrs. filed and payed, fought overseas in TWO WARS and he either forgot to inclose the check or they lost it, for it was marked in his checkbook ledger, and they beat the snot out of him till finally he quit and then quit for good! Might a government that would do such a thing act like a scumbag?
YOU TELL ME. sincerely, CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/08/2005 8:12 PM  

I have seen the injustice the IRS can impose on a family as I am a witness of a 72 year old man who was put into prison on a misdemeanor for failure to file one year of income tax. He got 5 months of prison and 5 months home incarceration. The joke is the irs said if you will plead guilty to one year (this was a continual plea) no jail time guess what when it was time for sentencing they said we want to make an example of him we want jail time. I am so disappointed in this system. They wanted to make an example out of him but tell me WHO KNOWS THIS no one does.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/10/2005 6:13 PM