Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Irwin Schiff Trial Coverage by Freedom Law School (Segment 6)

posted by David Jahn @ 10/18/2005 11:35:00 PM  

9 Old Comments:

The trial logs have not been accessable for nearly two days now.

The Audio Blog website is also down.

What's really going on?


# # #

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/19/2005 12:22 AM  

They have been working for me. No problems listening or reading.

By Blogger Unknown, at 10/19/2005 3:02 AM  

"It's the greatest program of organized extortion ever conceived by man," Irwin Schiff said in his closing argument. He insisted that paying income taxes is voluntary.

The 77-year-old anti-tax guru told the jury it was up to them to send a message to the government.

"You can do a big favor to the rest of the workers in this country who are holding down two and three jobs," he said. "We're not slaves of the United States government. Our wages don't belong to the United States government."

By Blogger Unknown, at 10/19/2005 3:05 AM  

Hmmm, never had that problem before. The trial logs are working now though; I closed all my windows, cleared my machine's cookies and whammo, I'm here.

Now, what was I going to say? - damn, I forgot.

Oh well, back in a bit.


# # #

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/19/2005 4:20 AM  

Otis, see segment 1 Freedom Law audio comments for my answer to your question and comment. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/19/2005 8:05 AM  

Right on Irwin! Our Constitution is the only thing that made our country special, it is designed to keep the government small and efficient.
Greed, corruption and conspiracy have ruined one of the shining pearls of human wisdom to have ever been put into writing.
I hope it is not too late to reverse the disease and return to
the nation that our designers intended.
It began with "taxation without representation" and if our elected officials ignore us and the constitution, what is the difference?.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/19/2005 9:55 AM  

Virtually all the bloggers have concerned themselves with Irwin. However Cindy and Mr. Cohrn are also on trial. Did you ever question why. Well, there are legitimate reasons why Cindy might have been suspected of Social Security violations however that is not the reason she was charged on all the other charges. As to Mr. Cohen he was just an employee and the entire case against him was an IRS agent asking him to fill out a zero income 1040 for her. Mr. Cohen’s attorney’s cross examination of that IRS agent revealed she could not testify if Mr. Cohen filled out anything. Therefore the evidence against him is non-existent. So why were they charged and brought to trial? Well, I’m guna tell yous guys. In order to charge and try Erwin on “conspiracy charges” they had to show he conspired with someone! Without the conspiracy charges their case against Irwin was not that serious. However, that may be their Achilles heel because one would have to believe the jury will not believe a minimum wage employee with nothing to gain and a girlfriend who they cannot even prove made a salery would jeopardize themselves to conspire to defraud the government.
For other other blogs from The Constitutionalist just left click on the blue The Constitutionalit at the beging of this blog. Or go to;
http://mickeydamouse.blogspot.com
http://stupefing.blogspot.com/
http://mickeydamouse2.blogspot.com
http://helliseternal.blogspot.com

By Blogger The Law, at 10/19/2005 9:57 AM  

I guess the ‘Notice of Levy’ and ‘Levy’ are really one in the same thing, and the ‘Notice of Levy’ is only given to third parties. But then how can a ‘Levy’ be given, in person, to a bank employee to get your money when it appears that paragraph ‘A’ of Section 6331 is posted on it?

People are complacent with how things are run, but they tell YOU to go out and get things changed, but when Schiff and Schulz went and took action practically everyone just shunned them as idiots.

I wonder how the rich people in New Orleans are surviving if they lived on higher ground? They may still have their property, but the utilities may still be out, and they cannot get any food or other miscellaneous items from stores as the people that worked there were paid low wages and could not stay in town as their homes were destroyed. This comes to the realization that even some of those in the ‘30’s that had gold still had a problem buying food and clothes.

Is Judge Dawson actually in charge and will have the jury dismissed if they comeback with a NOT-GUILTY verdict? Will Irwin be hauled off to jail pending his next trial which may not be for another few years?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/19/2005 12:48 PM  

non-liable said...
I guess the ‘Notice of Levy’ and ‘Levy’ are really one in the same thing, and the ‘Notice of Levy’ is only given to third parties. But then how can a ‘Levy’ be given, in person, to a bank employee to get your money when it appears that paragraph ‘A’ of Section 6331 is posted on it?

Haven't you read all the important posts that claim a tax protestor is a jew hater, or a flower and a tree are the same since they both grow but different than a bush because bush is the name of a president and not a plant? Gee whiz

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/19/2005 4:00 PM