Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Irwin Schiff Trial Coverage by Freedom Law School (Segment 2)

3 Old Comments:

Closing arguments by Irwin Schiff were completed on Monday Oct 17th in his criminal tax trial and now the jury is in deliberations.

Schiff apparently made some headway in repelling the governments prosecution witnesses who have testified so far.

Schiff and his former co workers Cindy Neun and Larry Cohen are defending themselves against a number of charges in Las Vegas stemming from consulting related to Schiff's book "The Federal Mafia" 'How the Government Illegally Imposes and Unlawfully Collects the Income Tax'

In the book Schiff details how anyone can file a legitimate income tax return claiming their income as zero because the Supreme Court, he says, has repeatedly and consistently defined the legal term of income as meaning a corporate profit or gain.

This is going to be a very interesting outcome of a trial because it could affect all of us.

Please bring this up so the people will know.

By Blogger LAWoman, at 10/19/2005 3:30 AM  

Otis, read comments at Segment 1 of Freedom law School audio post. CJ

By Anonymous cj, at 10/19/2005 8:02 AM  

As I see it, the problem we face lays in the, either inadvertent or deliberate, lies perpetrated in the federal judicial system. As an example, lets suppose congress passes a law that says, “White is the lightest color” Then, a year or so later federal judge A innocently rules, “Slightly off white is also acceptable as the lightest color” Then, because it suits his immediate sinister purpose federal judge B says “Light gray also falls within federal judge A’s written opinion” So, federal judge C solves his bigger sinister problem with “Dark Gray falls within federal judge B’s opinion” This progresses to the point that federal judge X says “All previous judges have set the precedent, so It is well established law, that Black is the lightest color”
That is exactly what happened in the federal system to the income tax laws. The federal government in earlier tax case had the federal judge A rule the tax laws are okay even if they are “slightly confusing (off white)” and then federal judge B, judge Dorsey told Irwin Schiff’s jury, in his first trial, “that they could find him guilty even if they thought the tax laws were not specific (dark gray) and the government did not prove their case against him.” That case set the ball in motion to where now federal judge X say “Well, the judge and jury in the Schiff case made it clear that there is a law compeling (Black as the ace of spades) the filing and payment of income tax.Which brings us to the case at hand. Federal judge Z, judge Dawson’s answer to Irwin’s question “Show me the law” is, “All the courts have ruled (Blacker then black) there is a law so I don’t have to show you or the jury anything!” That, my children is how the federal government, in most areas of our life, turns white into black and makes most of the citizens believe it even thought their eyes tell them different.
http://mickeydamouse.blogspot.com
http://stupefing.blogspot.com/
http://mickeydamouse2.blogspot.com
http://helliseternal.blogspot.com

By Blogger We the Constitutionalists, at 10/19/2005 10:34 AM