Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Irwin Schiff Trial Coverage by Freedom Law School (Segment 6)

7 Old Comments:

Schiff will get what he deserves.

GUILTY on all counts!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/18/2005 7:47 AM  

Anonymous said...
"Schiff will get what he deserves.
GUILTY on all counts! 10/18/2005 8:46 AM"

Did he physically harm you? If NOT, and I believer that is the case, what CRIME did he commit against you?

Don't you see, he didn't harm anyone. He offered his research and opinion based upon that research. Did you follow his opinion? I hope not for it is not wise to "follow" anything you haven't researched for yourself...even I am smart enough to get a "second opinion" with regard to important matters in life! If you followed and are unhappy that is your fault and you should throw "stones" at yourself.

If you did research beyond Mr. Schiff and tended to agree with your own research and you found yourself harmed, who in fact actually Brought Harm To You? The only answer is the IRS, not Schiff.

What we have here is, once again, a neo-Nazi type "thought" crime (alleged) and the victim is a piece of paper and ink. That is right, NO ONE was murdered, raped, tortured, wounded etc... by Mr. Schiff. Only a little piece of paper and ink with CONTRARY THOUGHTS were hurt
have the audacity to stand up for a piece of paper and throw stones at a human being for thinking rather than throw stones at yourself for NOT?

You act as though Stupidity were a Virtue...answer me, Why IS THAT?


By Anonymous cj, at 10/18/2005 8:37 AM  

"What good fortune for governments that the people do not think."
Adolf Hitler

"What luck for rulers, that men do not think."
Adolf Hitler - still applying his trade...

By Anonymous gd, at 10/18/2005 8:45 AM  

Attention IRS!

The easiest thing to do today, if you want a tax protestor’s property, is just go to the city’s officials, in which the tax protestor has the property, and tell them the city can TAKE the property under the Eminent Domain Supreme Court ruling that was issued this year, and we will share the proceeds with you.

One story is here in which the city is taking a person’s land for which the city will be developing in the same manner that that person was going to do, but the profits from it will be totally given to the city, and no re-imbursement to the present land owner.

By Anonymous non-liable, at 10/18/2005 1:46 PM  

During the entire Irwin Schiff trial Judge Dawson refused to inter into evidence anything that would help Mr. Schiff’s case that he was not forced to by law. If fact, he even forbade evidence which by law he was compelled to allow into evidence. As if that were not bad enough he also refused to allow all of Mr. Schiff’s witnesses whose credentials would have impressed the jury. Such as, a former FBI agent, one of the most renowned psychiatrists in the country, a much respected attorney from San Diego, a former IRS agent and others I fail to recall. This made me wonder just how far Judge Dawson would go to convict Mr. Schiff which led my fertile mind to conjure up this image.
When Mr. Schiff called this witness a murmur of shock echoed through the room as he entered the court. Judge Dawson immediately slammed down his gavel and roared, “Just by looking at him I can tell this witness would have nothing of value to say. The witness is excused and the marshals will escort him out of my courtroom!”
Suddenly three marshals appeared out of nowhere, rushed the witness and threw him to the floor which dislodged his crown of thorns. Then, as he struggled to get up it was obvious he was in pain from the large nail holes in his hands.
At that point a strange glow surrounded the witness which struck fear into the marshals, so they helped him carry his cross out of the room. But before the door slammed shut the witness turned, looked directly at Judge Dawson, and said, “You are pressing your luck with my old man!” To which Judge Kent J. Dawson answered, “How dare you or your father question my authority!”
On another subject isn’t it interesting the judge told Irwin he can’t participate in these blogs but allows the prosecution team and IRS agents i.e. Frankie Boy Buckner ect. to do so. The proof the prosecutors are commenting is the fact they site, by name and their attorneys name and the case numbers, of over twenty people who have lost in court. They also site obscure court rulings to prove their point. Who, other than disparate Federal Prosecutors, would have that information or bother to point it out? I believe if the person in charge of these blogs ran a trace on the commenters who site such cases then Mr. Schiff would be able to use that information should an appeal become necessary.
One of those prosecutor/IRS agents pointed out in a comment to this blog that anyone could get that information. The answer to that prosecutor is, “Yes. anyone can find that information. However, only a federal Prosecutor or IRS agent would do so because they have a dog in the fight.
And, as the jury takes the case it looks like their dog is a poodle while Irwin's is a vicious Rottweiler with its jaws tearing into the neck of your helpless Poodle.”
Now I know listening to the gurgling sounds coming from that white fur ball are sickening but the illegal crap must die for freedom to triumph.
For other other blogs from The Constitutionalist just left click on the blue The Constitutionalit at the beging of this blog. Or go to;

By Blogger We the Constitutionalists, at 10/18/2005 2:11 PM  

Virtually all the bloggers have concerned themselves with Irwin. However Cindy and Mr. Cohrn are also on trial. Did you ever question why. Well, there are legitimate reasons why Cindy might have been suspected of Social Security violations however that is not the reason she was charged on all the other charges. As to Mr. Cohen he was just an employee and the entire case against him was an IRS agent asking him to fill out a zero income 1040 for her. Mr. Cohen’s attorney’s cross examination of that IRS agent revealed she could not testify if Mr. Cohen filled out anything. Therefore the evidence against him is non-existent. So why were they charged and brought to trial? Well, I’m guna tell yous guys. In order to charge and try Erwin on “conspiracy charges” they had to show he conspired with someone! Without the conspiracy charges their case against Irwin was not that serious. However, that may be their Achilles heel because one would have to believe the jury will not believe a minimum wage employee with nothing to gain and a girlfriend who they cannot even prove made a salery would jeopardize themselves to conspire to defraud the government.
For other other blogs from The Constitutionalist just left click on the blue The Constitutionalit at the beging of this blog. Or go to;

By Blogger We the Constitutionalists, at 10/18/2005 4:31 PM  

I second the suggestion to watch "12 Angry Men".

Mary should start calling Peymon by his actual name instead of "Paymore" (LOL).

By Blogger Jamie, at 10/22/2005 5:27 AM