Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Irwin Schiff Trial Coverage by Freedom Law School (Segment 3 of 4)

11 Old Comments:

The most dangerous page on the web!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/12/2005 11:36 PM  

The court observers must have arrived late today because they did not talk about the first witness Irwin called. So here is what happened.
When Irwin called the witness a murmur of shock echoed through the room as he entered the court. Judge Dawson immediately slammed down his gavel and roared, “Just by looking at him I can tell this witness would have nothing of value to say. The witness is excused and the marshals will escort him out of my courtroom!” At that point three marshals rushed the witness and threw him to the floor which dislodged his crown of thorns. Then, as he struggled to get up it was obvious he was in pain from the large nail holes in his hands. At that point a strange glow surrounded the witness which struck fear in the marshals so they helped him carry his cross out of the room. But before the door slammed shut the witness turned, looked directly at Judge Dawson, and said, “You are pressing your luck with my old man!” To which Judge Kent J. Dawson answered, “How dare you or your father question my authority!”

By Blogger We the Constitutionalists, at 10/13/2005 12:15 AM  

Isn’t it interesting the judge tells Irwin he can’t participate in these blogs but allows the prosecution team to do so. The proof the prosecutors are commenting is the fact they site, by name and their attorneys name and the case numbers, of over twenty people who have lost in court. They also site obscure court rulings to prove their point. Who, other than disparate Federal Prosecutors, would have that information or bother to point it out? I suggest the person in charge of these blogs run a trace on the commenters who site such cases for Irwin to be able to prove who those people are.
One of the Prosecutors pointed out in a comment to this blog that anyone could get that information. The answer to that prosecutor is, “Yes anyone can find that information. However, only a federal Prosecutor or IRS agent would do so because they have a dog in the fight. And at this point it looks like their/your dog is a poodle while Irwin's is a vicious Rottweiler with its jaws tearing into the neck of your helpless Poodle.”

By Blogger We the Constitutionalists, at 10/13/2005 12:18 AM  

Kent J. Dawson,
United States District Court Judge,
U.S. District Court of Nevada,
333 South Las Vegas Boulevard,
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

No need to put Hon befor his name there is nothing honarable about him

Be sure to let this baboon know how you feel about him. Maybe someone can find him a job in North Korea or Zimbabwe I am sure that he will be able to teach them something.


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/13/2005 12:21 AM  

A fully informed jury should know that Cindy filed a 90+ palimony complaint against Irwin that used the word "rape" and that Irwin has been convicted twice before.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/13/2005 12:33 AM  

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

By Blogger Dr. C, at 10/13/2005 1:43 AM  

FACT: The IRS and its hit men have destroyed more American lives then the combination of casualties of both world wars.

FACT: The IRS achieves its goals using intimidation, fear and the threat of violence against American citizens.

FACT: The IRS places itself above the laws and the constitution of the United States.

Therefore, what jury in America will return a “not guilty” verdict? If I was sitting on this jury, I would be worried that if I don’t side with the IRS, then I’ll be the next one to be taken out.

By Blogger Dr. C, at 10/13/2005 1:46 AM  

Irwin is a stubborn quack you say?

Below is a true story of another fairly recent Quack...

This quack though he had found the cure for not just one but a number of "incurrable" diseases from - of all things - a substance derived from molds. The medical profession denigrated him (much like the quat..guys, Frank and others do here) him for a decade. The QUACK was Sir Alexander Fleming, and the substnce is penicillin.

More on the mindset of death and destruction, following that of Stalin and Hitler and others and expressed by the anti life and pro fallacious tax crowd cluttering the pages with their cluttered minds. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/13/2005 8:14 AM  

"The Constitutionalist"


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/13/2005 6:31 PM  

Isn't it comforting to know the people who work for the federal goverbnmebr like the federal employee anonymous above has such a vast knowledge of the English language, writing skills and imagination to offer that child like blog?

By Blogger We the Constitutionalists, at 10/13/2005 8:02 PM  

Anonymous cowardly silly person redefecated:

"A fully informed jury should know that Cindy filed a 90+ palimony complaint against Irwin that used the word "rape" and that Irwin has been convicted twice before."

Gee, that sounds familiar... oh yeah, you tried the same BS on the prior page:

"As far as the jury being "fully informed", they should be informed of Irwin's two prior felony convictions, as well as given a copy of Cindy's 90+ page palimony complaint where she complains about being raped and other things."

Might as well give your ad hominem BS the same flush here as it got there:

According to the reports we are listening to here, they were in fact informed of those convictions, and the palimony suit was settled well before this trial began. Maybe you should pay more attention. Ohhhhh, that's right: you already knew that, and were just trying to mislead casual lurkers.

Remember, lurkers: each case has to be proven SEPARATELY. You don't automatically become "guilty" in one case on account of having been found "guilty" in another. At least, not in America!

By Blogger Jamie, at 10/16/2005 9:19 PM