Thursday, October 20, 2005

Schiff Trial Update. (Update 2) Judge Dawson denies the jury's request to see code books

posted by David Jahn @ 10/20/2005 06:29:00 PM  

19 Old Comments:

New pictures of judge Dawson at;
http://helliseterna3.blogspot.com

By Blogger The Law, at 10/20/2005 6:52 PM  

If anyone is interested in politely emailing Judge Kent Dawson’s direct superior within the LDS Church you can address your emails to Elder Charles A. Didier he is over Kent Dawson’s Stake within the LDS Church. His email is DidierCA@ldschurch.org If you are LDS as I am, please, I encourage you to let Elder Didier know how you think about Dawson’s horrific and evil conspiring actions within his courtroom while he wears his black robes of darkness. For the record this is not how the LDS people are and is completely opposite of how LDS people in good standing should act. If you are sending an email please remember it is not Elder Charles Didier or any other LDS member that is at fault only Kent Dawson. I am embarrassed that he is known to be a Mormon let alone a Stake President. People that are blasting out stupid comments about the Mormon beliefs are just showing their ignorance; their comments are not even worth commenting on.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 6:58 PM  

Peymon cannot be trusted!

He asks for cash ONLY, so he is no different than all those that try and hide their assets.

Does he send a recordable money order over $3,000 or send cash to pay bills because he doesn’t have a bank account?

He says “patriot mythology is baseless;” Equity Law, Admiralty Law, Common Law, UCC Sec. 1-207, U.S. citizenship, Your name in capital letters, Using a ZIP code, and others. So what does he believe, if these are fairy tales?

He told me that any employer can terminate you within the first three months of employment even if you refuse to commit perjury on a government document!
He said; “You have NO case!!!”
That means your employer can order you to commit a crime or terminate you!

He will take your case, JUST TO GET YOUR MONEY, but he will tell you that you will loose!!!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 7:02 PM  

If you are in a "right to work" state Paymon is right. He can fire you because he does not like your nose or will not lie but that reason will not be on your termination slip.

By Blogger The Law, at 10/20/2005 7:07 PM  

And, if you, non-liable, do not hide your assets you are either a fool or and an IRS agent.
If you are the latter forget I wrote anything. I do not respond to your kind!

By Blogger The Law, at 10/20/2005 7:14 PM  

wolfgangsmutz said...
Just some food for thought.
Ridiculous thought he has already given Irwin several years in jail in sanctions. Dawson is a megalomaniac scumbag.

John

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 7:19 PM  

I have all the documentation and proof I need, as they could say I was terminated for an incident that happened to me with company property, but a person who had a worse incident a couple of weeks later was back to work in a couple of days but I was terminated.

I have letters from the company dealing with my situation and one from their lawyer so they cannot say it had anything to do with the incident or my looks.

I have found some cases on the internet that support the view that employers do NOT have the full AUTHORITY to terminate you within the first 3 months for ANY reason, or anytime after that for refusing to obey ANY order, which includes committing criminal activity. They MUST comply with the LAW just like everyone else or maybe employers SHOULD get into the business of hiring people to commit crimes as they would NOT be the ones held responsible!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 7:26 PM  

Anyone hoping to print and pass out literature anonymously (windshields, etc.) will be disapponted to discover that printer manufacturers have long employed hidden watermark signatures which help the FBI, Secret Service, IRS and others to identify the date, the printer and the owner from which the document came.

The Spy In Your Printer

================================

Cyber sleuths at San Francisco's Electronic Frontier Foundation announced this week that the virtually invisible lines of tiny yellow dots laid down on a page identify not only the individual printer but the date and time the document was printed.

The tracking system was devised to allow the Secret Service to track down currency counterfeiters; however, the foundation warned that the technology could be used as well to identify users who print flyers or other documents critical of the government.

"Even worse," said EFF Attorney Lee Tien, "it shows how the government and private industry make backroom deals to weaken our privacy. The logical next question is: what other deals have been or are being made to ensure that our technology rats on us?"

The foundation said it had only unraveled the code on the Xerox DocuColor printer but knows it exists on machines from other manufacturers.


# # #

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 7:43 PM  

Judge Dawson has a Catch-22 to deal with;
He complies with the church by complying with the U.S. Constitution, which we know he has failed to do that,
Or, He complies with the Masonic Lodge and makes sure the IRS and government is protected by convicting Schiff, which seems the most logical.

If he is thrown out of the church, then no big deal!
If he is thrown out of his judgeship, then he can run for Governor like Roy Moore, former judge.

http://www.palmsource.com/interests/religion_lds/
”While not originating with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Constitution of the United States is revered by members of this church. Accordingly, several founding documents are included here.”

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 7:48 PM  

To, Non-Reliable.
Now that I know you are sincere I will talk about your problem. I know you want justice; however in a "right to work state" your employer can fire you even after 90 days and give no reason unless there is a Union involved who will go to bat for you. And the other things you believe in such as, “Equity Law, Admiralty Law, Common Law, UCC Sec. 1-207, U.S. citizenship, Your name in capital letters, Using a ZIP code, and others." may well be a fact, however, in a court of law they mean nothing to the judge. However, if you use them the jury may decide you are nuts and let you off.
I suggest you just get on with your life and use Mr. Schiff's material and forget that other stuff.

By Blogger The Law, at 10/20/2005 8:41 PM  

THE "Law Merchant." This is strictly a voluntary law nowhere written down and it is strictly a private law of negotiable instruments, sales, insurance, and other matters binding only upon the honor of "merchants," as the personal income tax.
Now, this Law Merchant has never been the public positive law of any particular country, but the mere private, consensual, voluntary practice of international merchants and traders. Although partially incorporated into various uniform state codes on negotiable instruments, much of it is not necessarily in print. Indeed, some of it changes with women's fashions.
Thus, it is this unwritten private law of which the judges are bound to take "judicial notice" in their rulings. The principle being that, whatever else can be pleaded, any supposedly national law of civil constitutional right claimed violated can be ruled immaterial on the basis of this unseen, unspoken, imprinted, "natural" law. It never needs to be given in evidence, and always favors the practicing "merchant" communizer as against the quasi "merchant" citizen who hasn't the faintest idea that the judge sees him as a merchant, unable to understand.
William Avery CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 8:58 PM  

Fiction of LAW

An assumption or suppositioin of law that something which is or may be false is true, or that a state of facts exists which has never really taken places.

A rule of law which assumes as true, and wil not allow to be disproved, something which is false, but not impossible. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th ed. page 623. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:04 PM  

What the Code of the I.R.S. does is to describe the amount of the tax, and the manner in which it is determinable of payment by those who are or recognize themselves to be liable at law, that is, on some franchise taxable by the Government.

The only such franchises or privileges taxable are trading franchises, under which the liability to report lies for the privilege granted by the People of the particular state to operate as a person or do business in a corporate capacity (limited liability and perpetual succession).

The People were created by God, and the corporations by the People. Thus it is the corporations which owe allegiance to their creators, as the People owe to Their Own.

The People cannot bestow divinity or immortality upon any Person (corporation) any more than they can upon themselves. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:06 PM  

12. The United States includes a number of Insular Areas, each of which is unique and constitutes an integral part of the U.S. political family. Persons born in these areas are U.S. citizens

From the UN Covenant on civil and political rights...

Have you ever, in your lifetime, checked a box claiming to be a U.S. CITIZEN? Were you born in one of the insular areas? Did you elect, voluntarily so to state you were? Must you now comply since you agreed to be one? Are you in breech of contract if you don't comply?

We can say we are Americans, individuals all day long but we have mistakenly made th election and agreed to the terms and conditions of the contract and thus we must honor the contract or we are in breech!

What are the "terms and conditions" you agree to when you open a bank account? Who has read them? Heck, most banks don't even have them...go ask for it!

It's deeper than you think. CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:13 PM  

In the words of Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter: "Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements." CJ

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:17 PM  

“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of
the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be
rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.”
Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.

The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” Edward Mandell House

**Note the Social Security card states that without it you may not, which is really cannot, be employed.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:24 PM  

To, the Constitutionalist;

You said: “Now that I know you are sincere,” but when was I NOT sincere?
Was it when you thought I had ‘baloney,’ or was it when I had ‘bologna’?

I have followed Schiff’s materials almost as soon as I got them.
I have listened to each one of his tapes from the ‘Freedom Package’ at least 10 times, which is approximately 1,350 hours of listening, 8 months if you had a job of it.

My life is now ruined by using Schiff’s materials, because that is why I was terminated.
And now I must report on applications as to the fact I was terminated, but just the fact that I was is a good enough reason for an employer to refuse to hire me.

Didn’t you know that when Judge Dawson said; “I am the LAW,” he was stating Admiralty Law, and whatever the jury does, does NOT matter, and Irwin WILL be found guilty!

Should we allow Judges to be GOD’s, or should we stop it NOW?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:25 PM  

For those interested, here is my letter to Elder Didier:

Subject: Re: Judge Kent Dawson

Hello Elder Didier,

I was provided with your e-mail address from a Mormon acquaintance. I, myself, am not a Mormon, but I understand that Judge Dawson is, and that you are over his Stake. I feel it necessary to inform you about his behavior during the trial of Mr. Irwin Schiff in Las Vegas over the past six weeks. Judge Dawson has presented himself in a most horrid fashion. He has trampled on the Constitutional Rights of Mr. Schiff. He has blocked exculpatory evidence necessary for Mr. Schiff's defense. He prohibited many of Mr. Schiff's witnesses from testifying. He limited the testimony of those he allowed, to statements about Mr. Schiff's character only, and prohibited testimony about Mr. Schiff's knowledge or beliefs. He has acted as another biased prosecutor - invariably sustaining prosecution objections and overruling defense objections. He has permitted the case to go to the jury without a scintilla of evidence that there was a legal duty which might have been violated. And, when the jury asked for the law book containing the alleged lawful duty that Mr. Schiff is accused of violating, Judge Dawson, Mormon, refused their request.

This behavior is outrageous and lawless when committed by any judge; it is sacrilegious when exhibited by a Mormon. I just thought you should know.

Sincerely,

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/20/2005 9:25 PM  

This is nothing more than obstruction of justice on the judges part. Everyone here knows what that means. This judge should go directly to jail.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/22/2005 12:30 AM