Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Cohen, Schiff & Neun Trial Update from Angela Stark

7 Old Comments:

what is a blog anyway?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/11/2005 4:15 PM  

Definition of a blog:


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/11/2005 4:15 PM  

As I have said, this trial is a SHAM; the Judge meets secretly with the Prosecution; the Judge refuses to recognize the importance of CHEEK; the Judge Mirandized all witnesses; the Judge REFUSES to allow a defense by saying the defense witnesses might actually help Irwin (why, I thought that was what they were for!). I wonder why the Prosecution witnesses were not Mirandized? And why the Prosecution was allowed to present any and all witnesses they wanted? How can anyone say Irwin is being treated fairly? Irwin is being RAILROADED!

By Blogger Tally Eddings, at 10/11/2005 4:17 PM  

Irwin will get to appeal, and nobody who matters thinks that the prosecution witnesses committed any crime.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/11/2005 4:58 PM  

BTW, the ONLY appeal that Irwin has ever won was the one where the guy called him on his $100,000 challenge, and Irwin had to appeal on the basis that he had withdrawn his offer at the end of the call-in show, therefore it was not longer open when the guy called him the next day to claim the prize.

Although the Court of Appeals allowed Irwin to avoid payment of the bet on this technicality, the court stated that Irwin was wrong and had lost the bet.

And THAT, dearest readers, is the one and only appeal that bumbling old Irwin ever won.

Irwin had the time to hire top attorneys, and plenty of money in his Belize trusts to hire top attorneys, but as usual his EGO got in the way of common sense. If Irwin wants to know why he is losing this trial so badly, he need only look in the mirror.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/11/2005 5:27 PM  

nobody who matters thinks that the prosecution witnesses committed any crime. ???

What is your definition of nobody who matters?

Self-righteous pieces of human garbage that think laws ONLY apply to us little people?

You people are pathetic.


BTW: The judge did NOT actually Mirandize the witnesses.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/11/2005 5:29 PM  

You know.. I thought for a min that some of the anti Irwin posts here could be genuine... but you have to remember we are talking about income tax... Personally, I don't know any sheeple that care enough about the legality of the income tax to find this blog, read the comments, and be excited enough to post dumb messages in a forum where folks site the law.. I mean honestly...

The only people who are motivated to post messages in this forum are folks that care.. and if you are Anti Irwin.. what exactly drives you to care enough to post here? could it be that you just love the income tax that much? I dont think so.. rather.. I bet the anti Irwin posts are being posted by folks who have an alternative agenda... or are being paid by someone who is.

To all you tools out there: Who's your daddy?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10/11/2005 8:46 PM